Climate
Net Zero & the
Green Agenda
Put simply: "Net Zero" refers to the ambition to achieve zero CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions on a net basis by midcentury to avert climate change.
"But now voters are demanding an armistice if not an outright surrender. A growing body of opinion polling and mounting anecdotal political evidence augur the collapse of this project — and sooner rather than later." (
source)
"In order to achieve global net-zero by 2050, by 2030 we would already need to achieve the equivalent of removing the combined emissions of China and the United States — every year. This is in the realm of science fiction:
- Canada's current plan will cost ¼ million jobs, 7% lower GDP, and $8,000 in lost wages per year;
- Getting to Net Zero will take 160 years;
- We are a century or two away from 100% renewables;
- Net Zero benefit is $700 CAD per person per year;
- Net Zero cost is $4,000-$30,000 CAD per person per year."
"Policymakers need to STOP using the word ENERGY and start referring to the demands of the economy for reliable supply chains of:
- Products - more than 6,000 that are made from oil derivatives manufactured from oil;
- Transportation Fuels such as gasoline, diesel, and aviation fuels that support the demand of cars, trucks, ships, and airplanes; and
- Electricity that is economically priced, continuous and uninterruptable.
It is worrisome that the "Green" and "Net Zero" policy makers in all Western countries presently spending billions on solar and wind generated electricity completely ignore proven scientific and engineering research by widely qualified academics and engineers that shows conclusively that carbon dioxide has only a minuscule effect upon global temperatures, thus the whole world-wide Net Zero push is all for nothing, it is unnecessary! The amount of money wasted upon Net Zero world-wide is staggering."
"Sky News Australia reveals the true cost of the race to renewable energy in an exclusive investigation by political contributor
Chris Uhlmann:
- It is impossible to overstate the stakes if the world's energy transition runs off the rails — and it will;
- With solar power, prices rise, energy security falls;
- Wind and solar not flexible in delivery;
- Claim of cheap, reliable green power is a fraud;
- Promoters of 'green' power don't know what they're doing;
- 'Green' energy doesn't work without natural gas;
- To avoid brownouts and blackouts, we will need two electrical systems."
Additional links:
"With the sun at its peak, the country's largely solar-powered electrical grid shut down. The few voices that warned of the considerable risk of forcing in too much renewable power were marginalized by the system operator. This state-controlled company that manages the grid forcefully denied the possibility of blackouts. Media outlets supportive of the government amplified these denials.
A modern society can't function without an electricity grid. The grid collapse was the result of a series of brazen missteps by lawmakers. They disregarded warnings grounded in laws of physics. Spain left its electrical grid exposed to imbalances that became impossible to stabilize."
"This bill (in the UK) gives the government the power to fine you up to 15,000 pounds, or one year in prison, should you fail to meet energy performance targets. Authorities can enter your home without a warrant using reasonable force. Or force you to have energy assessments. How are you going to pay the 15,000 pounds? Well, quite possibly with a lien against your property. In the event that you should die or sell your property, the government can cash in. It won't work, but it will be highly lucrative in the process. It's really just about generating money from the people for the government. Only 1% of global CO
2 emissions are from the UK. China increases by more than that in a year, so we are just exporting pollution and emissions. Does that make any sense? It also gives access to SMART appliances and control of how much energy we are allowed via load control system SMART meters. This is the path forward to our new digital prisons, called
15 Minute Cities, in order to combat Climate Change."
"Across the USA, wind power outfits are being repeatedly busted for dumping their blades and simply cutting and running. Then there are scammers like Global Fiberglass Solutions Inc which makes claims about recycling dumped blades, notwithstanding there is no market for ground up toxic waste, funnily enough. Principal among the toxic agents to be found in turbine blades is Bisphenol A - a compound banned in numerous countries. Back in August 2021, Global Fiberglass Solutions Inc was busted for piling up over 1,300 blades at three makeshift dumps in Iowa - despite claiming it would 'recycle' them."
As Mark Lawson puts it in his book, Dark Ages, "In order to avoid a climate crisis that never seems to arrive, activists and governments are about to plunge us all into a very real power crisis."
"The whole emissions debate involves spending billions and imposing more billions in costs on the economy for no gain of any kind. Even if we assume that Australia's emissions reduction effort is matched by other countries, which plainly isn't happening, it is all but impossible to construct a cost-benefit analysis to justify the billions being spent. "Australian attempts to convert to renewables basically have no parallel. To make matters worse, not only do policy-makers want to shift to all renewables they want to throw away the fossil fuel back-up power sources. This has not happened anywhere and is madness"."
"Under President Jim Yong Kim (2012-2019), the World Bank banned funding for coal-fired power plants in 2013 and later nixed upstream oil and gas projects. Deepak Lal, a previous Research Administrator at the bank, slammed Kim for ignoring data showing coal's affordability over renewables like solar or wind in poor countries. This is a betrayal of the bank's poverty-alleviation mandate, driven by Western fantasies of a 'climate emergency' hyped by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who is fond of phrases like "global boiling".
The bank's new initiatives — Climate Resilient Debt Clauses, Liveable Planet Funds — tie loans to green and social goals. This starves funding for conventional infrastructure projects that actually lift people out of poverty. This is what the-then Senior Economic Advisor to the Government of India Arvind Subramaniam called carbon imperialism a decade ago, referring to Western elites imposing anti-fossil fuel rules that choke developing nations' access to cheap forms of energy."

Video
Robbie Williams gets it:
- "We're in a post-truth world.
- Where you can't believe the media.
- You can't believe Big Pharma.
- You can't believe politicians.
- You can't believe what you're eating."
|
May 22, 2023
How can you spread the message that They Lied?
Stay up to date with our Newsletter
Click here to STOP the Globalist Agenda
Click here to support our work.
Click here to email us at contact@theylied.ca
They Lied Site Map
